Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda - Hallo friends Health Physical Therapy, In the article you read this time with the title Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda, We have prepared this article for you to read and retrieve information therein. Hopefully the contents of postings We write this you can understand. Alright, good read.

Title : Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda
link : Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda

Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda

The recent New York Times piece on the behavior of (mainly for-profit, but by extension...) US organizations' boards of directors, goes some way toward explaining the anechoic effect.

The redoubtable Gretchen Morgenson reports on the gulf between company directors' approach to transparency in the United States when compared, say, with a lot of boards in the UK, Holland, and the Scandinavian countries.

The novel idea of taking shareholders' views into account seems to be far more common on the other side of the pond. When it comes to for-profit entities, of course, investors' expectations come into play--you'd think this would be an easier case.

One would think that directors would take their fiduciary responsibilities seriously, and at least listen. In the US, however, there seems to be a systematic process of hiving off the directors in a sort of anechoic chamber. Two-thirds of board members in one survey didn't communicate at all with the outside world. Over half hadn't even had a discussion about their organizational communications policies!

Non-profits--and health care spans both types--don't have investors per se. But they have lots of stake-holders. Health Care Renewal's editor and lead blogger, Dr. Poses, has reported in these pages early and often about the lack of transparency on both sides of this rather artificial divide. It's a bit surprising, then, to hear that accountability is more highly valued in Europe than in these democratic United States.

My own experience with boards has been highly consonant with this insular approach. Directors seem mostly there to prop up management. Rubber stamps are the most important tools. Fat wallets also help. Circling the wagons is the most important skill set. Board members in health care organizations, including those that are not-for-profit, either don't talk about what they see lacking, or, scarier still, it's nicely hidden from them. Probably both. I've heard chairpersons publicly excoriate directors, in front of their peers, for "free-lancing" when they engaged in responsible outside communication.

These boards, and especially their chars, almost invariably defer to management. Non-profits wait until their top management do something not merely execrable but illegal and humiliating before they remove them. Is this laziness or selling-out? Unclear. Maybe both.

If this is the kind of American Exceptionalism our organizations subscribe to, they might want to try being a bit more unexceptional!

Thus Article Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda

The article Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda This time, hopefully can give benefits to all of you. well, see you in posting other articles.

You are now reading the article Good Health and Times: American boards are exceptional--and not necessarily in a good way. Elvonda with the link address https://portneufphece.blogspot.com/2015/03/good-health-and-times-american-boards.html

Tweet